Health Impacts of Geothermal Energy Development: An Environmental and Public Health Perspective

Authors

  • Porn Pan University of Puthishashtra, Phnom Penh, Cambodia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64235/y70en621

Keywords:

geothermal energy, public health, environmental health, hydrogen sulfide, socioeconomic impact, health impact assessment, renewable energy development

Abstract

Geothermal energy development is expanding rapidly across both established geothermal regions and newly developing
markets, driven by the technology’s capacity to deliver low-carbon, dispatchable baseload power. This global expansion,
however, brings geothermal energy’s characteristic environmental and health considerations to an increasingly diverse
range of geologic, climatic, socioeconomic, and regulatory settings, from long-industrialized geothermal districts in
Italy to rapidly scaling geothermal programs in East Africa. This article presents an environmental and public health
perspective on the health impacts of geothermal energy development, synthesizing chronic and acute hydrogen sulfide
exposure epidemiology, environmental and socioeconomic impact assessment from an African development context, and
quantitative environmental risk assessment methodology encompassing seismic, ecological, and economic dimensions
alongside human health. It draws on subsurface reactive transport modeling and reactive heat exchanger engineering
relevant to long-term geothermal reservoir performance, machine learning-enhanced geomechanical characterization
relevant to induced seismicity and wellbore stability risk, and heterogeneous reservoir management principles from
analogous subsurface energy operations, and further considers how AI-driven precision public health, predictive analytics,
and economic impact assessment frameworks developed for national healthcare systems could strengthen environmental
and public health surveillance as geothermal development continues to expand into new regions. The article concludes
by identifying persistent gaps in geographic evidence diversity, socioeconomic impact integration, and cross-national
assessment standardization, and proposes a research agenda for advancing environmental and public health protection
as geothermal energy development scales globally.]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bustaffa, E., Cori, L., Manzella, A., Nuvolone, D., Minichilli, F., Bianchi, F., & Gorini, F. (2020). The health of communities living in proximity of geothermal plants generating heat and electricity: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 706, Article 135998.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135998

Chen, S., Zhang, Q., Andrews-Speed, P., & Mclellan, B.

(2020). Quantitative assessment of the environmental risks of geothermal energy: A review. Journal of Environmental

Management, 276, Article 111287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

jenvman.2020.111287

Mariita, N. O. (2002). The impact of large-scale renewable energy development on the poor: Environmental and socio-

economic impact of a geothermal power plant on a poor rural community in Kenya. Energy Policy, 30(11–12), 1119–1128. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00063-0

Nguyen, T. T. (2026a). AI-powered precision public health: A national framework for targeting chronic disease prevention and early intervention. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 7(3), 10–20.

Nguyen, T. T. (2026c). The economic impact of AI adoption in healthcare: Estimating national cost savings, productivity gains, and long-term health outcomes. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, and Machine Learning, 7(3), 1–11.

Nguyen, T. T. (2026d). National-scale predictive analytics for Medicare and Medicaid: An AI-driven approach to identifying high-risk populations and reducing healthcare costs. Journal of Advanced Scientific Research, 17(6), 1–10.

Nuvolone, D., Petri, D., Biggeri, A., Barbone, F., & Voller, F. (2020).

Health effects associated with short-term exposure to hydrogen sulfide from geothermal power plants: A case-crossover study in the geothermal areas in Tuscany. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 93(6), 669–682. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01522-9

Nuvolone, D., Petri, D., Pepe, P., & Voller, F. (2019). Health effects associated with chronic exposure to low-level hydrogen sulfide from geothermoelectric power plants. A residential cohort study in the geothermal area of Mt. Amiata in Tuscany. Science of the Total Environment, 659, 973–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

scitotenv.2018.12.402

Rotich, I. K., Chepkirui, H., Musyimi, P. K., & Kipruto, G. (2024).

Geothermal energy in Kenya: Evaluating health impacts and environmental challenges. Energy for Sustainable Development, 82, Article 101522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2024.101522 [11] Stoppa, G., Nuvolone, D., Petri, D., Centi, L., Nisticò, F., Crocetti, E., Barbone, F., & Voller, F. (2023). Exposure to low levels of hydrogen sulphide and its impact on chronic obstructive pulmonary

disease and lung function in the geothermal area of Mt. Amiata in Italy: The cross-sectional InVETTA study. PLOS One, 18(11), Article e0293619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293619

Downloads

Published

2026-08-29

How to Cite

Health Impacts of Geothermal Energy Development: An Environmental and Public Health Perspective. (2026). Journal of Science Technology and Social Transformation, 2(03), 36-41. https://doi.org/10.64235/y70en621